Home  |     |  IpHorgan: Intellectual Property Law Firm    
IpHorgan.com
Services Newsletter People Contact
Newsletter - Volume 10, November 2006

New Exemptions to Prohibition Against Circumvention of Technology

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) contains numerous provisions that guard against individuals attempting to circumvent copyright controls or protection in various technologies. However, pursuant to terms of the DMCA, the Librarian of Congress has issued a rule setting out six classes of works that will be subject to three-year exemptions from the statute's prohibition against circumvention of technology. The proponents of these exemptions were able to demonstrate that the prohibition on circumventing access control had a substantial adverse effect on the ability of people to make non-infringing uses of the six particular classes of copyrighted works. The six classes of copyrighted works, subject to additional restrictions, are: 1) audiovisual works included in the educational library of a college or university's film or media studies department; 2) computer programs and video games distributed in formats that have become obsolete and that require the original media  or hardware as a condition of access; 3) computer programs protected by dongles that prevent access due to malfunction or damage and which are obsolete; 4) literary works distributed in ebook format when all existing ebook editions of the work contain various access controls; 5) computer programs in the form of firmware that enable wireless telephone handsets to connect to a wireless telephone communication network; 6) sound recordings, and audiovisual works associated with those sound recordings, distributed in compact disc format and protected by technological protection measures that control access to lawfully purchased works. Those who may benefit from three of the newer classes of exempted works include owners of wireless telephone handsets who want to continue to use the handsets when they switch to new wireless carriers, film professors making compilations of film clips for classroom instruction, and those who test, investigate and correct security vulnerabilities on compact discs that are distributed with access control technology that compromises the security of personal computers. The exemptions went into effect on November 27, 2006, and will remain in effect until October 27, 2009.

Perfumer's Tagline Causes a Stink

Perfumer Sephora most recent promotion using the tagline "The Greatest Gift Show on Earth," landed it in court with the greatest of ease.  The marketing campaign features a swinging trapeze artist animation and a festive organ grinder's monkey.  Once the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey circus, which has been using its famous "The Greatest Show on Earth" mark since the 1890's, learned of the promotion, it filed a suit against Sephora and its parent company, the Paris-based LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA, in the U.S. District Court in Manhattan.

Priority Document Electronic Exchange Program Between USPTO and EPO

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the European Patent Office (EPO) are set to launch a new free service that will simplify filing procedures in each others offices by allowing patent application priority documents to be exchanged between the two offices electronically.  Filing of priority documents is required when applicants are claiming an earlier application filing date in one patent office based on a prior application filing in another. Claiming priority is a valuable tool for businesses investigating whether to pursue patent rights globally because it provides additional time for making a decision as to whether and how extensively to pursue worldwide protection.   Under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, a patent applicant may file an application in one Paris Convention member country (the priority document), and within 12 months, file corresponding applications in other member countries, while obtaining the benefit of the first application's filing date. Paris Convention filings are a critical component in many applicants' global business and patenting strategies and represent a substantial portion of worldwide patent activity. It is expected that as a result of this agreement, substantial benefits of reduced expenses and paperwork will ensue when filing a Paris Convention application in the EPO.  Other treaties also provide for foreign application rights.  For example, the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) can effectively defer the decision of whether and in which countries to file a patent application up to 2 ½ years from the original priority document filing date.

Disclaimer: The contents of this newsletter are presented for information purpose only, and as such are not intended to constitute legal advice and should not be construed as such or acted upon without seeking advice of legal counsel. This information is not intended to and shall not create an attorney-client relationship of any kind or nature with IPHorgan Ltd. Please contact the firm with queries, concerns or for further details regarding the information presented herein. The entire contents are current only as of the date of the newsletter and are not to be interpreted as the opinions of our clients past, present, pending or future. (c)2006, IpHorgan Ltd. All Rights Reserved.


Newsletter Archive

Newsletter Volume 49, February 2010 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 48, January 2010 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 47, December 2009 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 46, November 2009 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 45, October 2009 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 44, September 2009 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 43, August 2009 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 42, July 2009 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 41, June 2009 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 40, May 2009 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 39, April 2009 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 38, March 2009 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 37, February 2009 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 36, January 2009 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 35, December 2008 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 34, November 2008 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 33, October 2008 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 32, September 2008 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 31, August 2008 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 30, July 2008 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 29, June 2008 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 28, May 2008 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 27, April 2008 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 26, March 2008 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 25, February 2008 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 24, January 2008 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 23, December 2007 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 22, November 2007 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 21, October 2007 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 20, September 2007 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 19, August 2007 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 18, July 2007 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 17, June 2007 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 16, May 2007 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 15, April 2007 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 14, March 2007 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 13, February 2007 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 12, January 2007 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 11, December 2006 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 10, November 2006 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 9, October 2006 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 8, September 2006 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 7, August 2006 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 6, July 2006 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 5, June 2006 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 4, May 2006 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 3, April 2006 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 2, March 2006 | HTML

Newsletter Volume 1, February 2006 | HTML

IpHorgan Ltd.  |  1130 Lake Cook Rd., Suite #240; Buffalo Grove, IL 60089
Tel (847) 808 5500  |  Fax (847) 808 7238  |  iplaw@iphorgan.net